1. D.M. Di Toro, H.E. Allen, H.L. Bergman, J.S. Meyer, P.R. Paquin, R.C. Santore, Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical Basis, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 20(10), 2383-2393(2001).
2. B. Jeong, J. An, K. Nam, Time series analysis for determining ecologically acceptable Cu concentration from species sensitivity distribution with biotic ligand models in soil pore water, Environ. Eng. Res., 26(2), 14-21(2021).
3. K.A. De Schamphelaere, D.G. Heijerick, C.R. Janssen, Refinement and field validation of a biotic ligand model predicting acute copper toxicity to Daphnia magna, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol., 133(1-2), 243-258(2002).
4. Y.-J. An, S.W. Kim, J. Moon, S.-W. Jeong, R.-Y. Kim, J.-K. Yoon, T.-S. Kim, An introductory research for development of soil ecological risk assessment in korea, J. Korea Soc. Environ. Eng., 39(6), 348-355(2017).
5. J. An, B. Jeong, K. Nam, Extension of biotic ligand model to account for the effects of pH and phosphate in accurate prediction of arsenate toxicity, J. Hazard. Mater., 385, 121619(2020).
6. W.-Q. Liang, M. Xie, Q.-G. Tan, Making the biotic ligand model kinetic, easier to develop, and more flexible for deriving water quality criteria, Water Res., 188, 116548(2021).
7. S. Niyogi, C.M. Wood, Biotic ligand model, a flexible tool for d eveloping s ite-specific water quality guid elines for metals, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(23), 6177-6192(2004).
8. V.I. Slaveykova, K.J. Wilkinson, Predicting the bioavailability of metals and metal complexes: Critical review of the biotic ligand model, Environ. Chem., 2(1), 9-24(2005).
9. J.C. Gondek, R.W. Gensemer, C.A. Claytor, S.P. Canton, J.W. Gorsuch, Framework for derivation of water quality criteria using the biotic ligand model: Copper as a case study, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 14(6), 736-749(2018).
10. J. McConaghie, A. Matzke, Technical Support Document: An evaluation to derive statewide copper criteria using the biotic ligand model, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality pp. 1-159(2016).
11. B. Jeong, J. An, K. Nam, Derivation of ecotoxicologically acceptable Cu concentrations in the Han River basin, Korea with emphasis on Ca concentration and instantaneously changing water characteristics, Sci. Total Environ., 828, 154495(2022).
12. A. Ryan, R. Santore, C. Delos, Application of a fixed monitoring benchmark approach to evaluate attainment of time variable water quality criteria: Copper biotic ligand model as a case study, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 14(6), 722-735(2018).
13. L. Posthuma, T.P. Traas, G.W. Suter, General introduction to species sensitivity distributions, Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA pp. 3-11(2002).
14. J. An, S. Jeong, H. S. Moon, K. Nam, Assessment of risk based pollution level of Pb and Cd in metal contaminated soils using biotic ligand model, J. Soil Groundwater Environ., 16(4), 23-30(2011).
15. K. Sorgog, M. Kamo, Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 183, 109494(2019).
16. T. Naaz, A. Kumar, A. Vempaty, N. Singhal, S. Pandit, P. Gautam, S.P. Jung, Recent advances in biological approaches towards anode biofilm engineering for improvement of extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells, Environ. Eng. Res., 28(5), 220666(2023).
17. HydroQual, Calculation of BLM fixed monitoring benchmarks for copper at selected monitoring sites in Colorado. Mahwah (NJ). Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency. pp 1-512008.
19. L. Monnin, P. Ciffroy, J.M. Garnier, J.P. Ambrosi, O. Radakovitch, Remobilization of trace metals during laboratory resuspension of contaminated sediments from a dam reservoir, J. Soils Sediments., 18(7), 2596-2613(2018).
20. R.C. Santore, D.M. Di Toro, P.R. Paquin, H.E. Allen, J.S. Meyer, Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 2. Application to acute copper toxicity in freshwater fish and Daphnia, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 20(10), 2397-2402(2001).
21. A. Crémazy, C.M. Wood, T.Y.T. Ng, D.S. Smith, M.J. Chowdhury, Experimentally derived acute and chronic copper biotic ligand models for rainbow trout, Aquat. Toxicol., 192, 224-240(2017).
22. K.A. De Schamphelaere, C.R. Janssen, Bioavailability models for predicting copper toxicity to freshwater green microalgae as a function of water chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(14), 4514-4522(2006).
23. J. Park, S.D. Kim, Derivation of predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) for heavy metals in freshwater organisms in Korea using species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), Minerals., 10(8), 697(2020).
24. National Institute of Environmental Research Notice No. 2021-13, Regulations on specific methods of chemical risk assessment, etc. [Appendix 4] Minimum data requirements for using species sensitivity distribution (related to Article 6, Paragraph 6, Item 2), (2021).
25. H. Wigger, D. Kawecki, B. Nowack, V. Adam, Systematic consideration of parameter uncertainty and variability in probabilistic species sensitivity distributions, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 16(2), 211-222(2020).
26. K.S. Smith, L.S. Balistrieri, A.S. Todd, Using biotic ligand models to predict metal toxicity in mineralized systems, Appl. Geochemistry., 57, 55-72(2015).
27. J. Chung, D.S. Hwang, D.H. Park, Y.J. An, D.H. Yeom, T.J. Park, J. Choi, J.H. Lee, Derivation of acute copper biotic ligand model-based predicted no-effect concentrations and acute-chronic ratio, Sci. Total Environ., 780, 146425(2021).
28. K.V. Brix, D.K. DeForest, W.J. Adams, Assessing acute and chronic copper risks to freshwater aquatic life using species sensitivity distributions for different taxonomic groups, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 20(8), 1846-1856(2001).
29. B. Lee, B. Lee, P. Kim, H. Yoon, Ecological risk assessment of lead and arsenic by environmental media, J. Environ. Health Sci., 46(1), 1-10(2020).
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Aquatic Life Ambient Freshwater Quality Criteria - Copper; EPA/822/R-07/001, Office of Water: Washington, DC, pp 1-204(2007).
31. K.V. Brix, D.K. DeForest, L. Tear, M. Grosell, W.J. Adams, Use of multiple linear regression models for setting water quality criteria for copper: A complementary approach to the biotic ligand model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51(9), 5182-5192(2017).
32. D.K. DeForest, R.W. Gensemer, E.J. Genderen, V. Genderen, J.W. Gorsuch, Protectiveness of water quality criteria for copper in western United States waters relative to predicted olfactory responses in juvenile Pacific salmon, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 7(3), 336-347(2011).
33. USEPA, Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment, EPA/540/G-90/008 (1990).
34. Ministry of food and drug safety, Guidelines for Completion of Hazard Assessment Report, (2015).
35. K.L. Sciera, J.J. Isely, J.R. Tomasso, S. Klaine, Influence of multiple water-quality characteristics on copper toxicity to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), Environ. Toxicol., 23(12), 2900-2905(2004).
36. A. Adekunle, C. Rickwood, B. Tartakovsky, On-line monitoring of water quality with a floating microbial fuel cell biosensor: field test results, Ecotoxicol., 30, 851-862(2021).
37. T. Naaz, A. Kumar, A. Vempaty, N. Singhal, S. Pandit, P. Gautam, S.P. Jung, Recent advances in biological approaches towards anode biofilm engineering for improvement of extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells, Environ. Eng. Res., 28(5), 220666(2023).
38. S.P. Jung, S. Son, B. Koo, Reproducible polarization test methods and fair evaluation of polarization data by using interconversion factors in a single chamber cubic microbial fuel cell with a brush anode, J. Clean. Prod., 390, 136157(2023).
39. D. Yu, L. Bai, J. Zhai, Y. Wang, S. Dong, Toxicity detection in water containing heavy metal ions with a self-powered microbial fuel cell-based biosensor, Talanta., 168, 210-216(2017).
40. S. Naik, S.E. Jujjavarapu, Self-powered and reusable microbial fuel cell biosensor for toxicity detection in heavy metal polluted water, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9(4), 105318(2021).
41. J.D. Cuppett, S.E. Duncan, A.M. Dietrich, Evaluation of copper speciation and water quality factors that affect aqueous copper tasting response, Chem. Senses., 31(7), 689-697(2006).
42. K.J. Kramer, R.G. Jak, B. van Hattum, R.N. Hooftman, J.J. Zwolsman, Copper toxicity in relation to surface water-dissolved organic matter: Biological effects to Daphnia magna, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 23(12), 2971-2980(2004).
43. K.A. De Schamphelaere, C.R. Janssen, potassium, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(1), 48-54(2001).
44. S.H. Arambawatta-Lekamge, A. Pathiratne, I.V.N. Rathnayake, Sensitivity of freshwater organisms to cadmium and copper at tropical temperature exposures: Derivation of tropical freshwater ecotoxicity thresholds using species sensitivity distribution analysis, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 211, 111891(2021).
45. ANZG, Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Australian and New Zealand Governments and Australian state and territory governments, Canberra ACT, Australia,
https://www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines (2020)