Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Industrial Categories | Flow (m3/d) | Discharge type | Main treatment process | Inf./Eff. TOC (mg/L) | TOC Removal rate (%) | Ref. | Industrial Categories | Flow (m3/d) | Discharge type | Main treatment process | lnf./Eff. TOC (mg/L) | TOC Removal rate (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Non-ferrous metals manufacturing | 457 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 42/12.8 | 70% | [8] | Alcoholic beverages manufacturing | 2,300 | Indirect | Phy.+Bio. | 848/9.4 | 99% | [8] |
4,165 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 370/10.7 | 97% | [8] | 2,903 | Indirect | Phy.+Bio. | 908/16.4 | 98% | [8] | ||
Basic Chemistry substance manufacturing | 1,000 | Direct | Phy.+Bio. | 389/11.1 | 97% | [8] | 620 | Indirect | Phy.+Bio.+Filter | 9,005/50.2 | 99% | [8] | |
1,230 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 567/77.1 | 86% | [8] | 2,903 | Direct | Phy.+Bio.+Filter | 775/45.1 | 94% | [8] | ||
1,511 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 259/8.0 | 97% | [8] | Electricity | 13,816 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Filter | 29/19.0 | 34% | [8] | |
4,316 | Direct | Phy.+Che+Bio.+Coag.+Filter | 1,812/17.2 | 99% | [8] | 9,178 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Filter | 43/2.8 | 93% | [8] | ||
Other Chemical product manufacturing | 762 | Indirect | Phy.+Bio. | 167/8.6 | 95% | [8] | Pulp & paper | 1,373 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 271/110.0 | 59% | [9] |
74 | Indirect | Phy.+Bio. | 1,482/19.9 | 99% | [8] | 450 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 86/29.0 | 66% | [9] | ||
3,226 | Direct | Phy.+Che. | 33/3.6 | 89% | [8] | 5,620 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 134/16.9 | 87% | [7] | ||
1,635 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Coag.+Filter | 3,713/81.0 | 98% | [8] | 9,068 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 381/50.4 | 87% | [8] | ||
Slaughter•Meat•Seafood•Processing & storage•Treatment facility | 1,881 | Direct | Phy.+Bio+Filter | 419/12.2 | 97% | [8] | 2,850 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 674/109.5 | 84% | [10] | |
70 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 57/11.0 | 81% | [10] | 17,200 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 729/44.6 | 94% | [9] | ||
5,930 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 616/7.1 | 99% | [8] | 11,000 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 738/40.1 | 95% | [9] | ||
1,875 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Coag. | 740/11.8 | 98% | [8] | 20,000 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter+A/C | 312/22.6 | 93% | [8] | ||
1,200 | Direct | Phy.+Bio+Coag. | 1,950/23.8 | 99% | [10] | 12,000 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Coag. | 1,003/34.1 | 97% | [9] | ||
Synthetic rubber Plastic substance manufacturing | 6,217 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 751/70.4 | 91% | [8] | Wastewater treatment consignment | 345 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Phy&Che | 3,152/79.9 | 97% | [10] |
5,646 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 509/58.8 | 88% | [8] | 305 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Phy&Che | 19,989/79.9 | 100% | [10] | ||
Petroleum refining | 7,325 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 51/8.1 | 84% | [8] | Plastic product manufacturing | 365 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 69/43.8 | 37% | [8] |
9,158 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 61/10.2 | 83% | [8] | 200 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 141/8.3 | 94% | [8] | ||
10.473 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 146/14.3 | 90% | [8] | 1.826 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Filter | 60/12.2 | 80% | [8] | ||
Textile manufacturing and finishing | 2,703 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 191/11.5 | 94% | [8] | Semiconductor | 4.320 | Indirect | Phy.+Che. | 29/10.6 | 63% | [8] |
2,017 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 271/27.7 | 90% | [8] | 7.848 | Direct | Phy.+Che.+Bio.+Filter | 248/3.2 | 99% | [8] | ||
1,351 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Bio. | 2,401/67.0 | 97% | [8] | 8,846 | Indirect | Phy.+Che.+Filter+Ozone | 40/8.9 | 77% | [8] |
NO | Industry sector | Raw wastewater | Applied technology | Result | Test conditions | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Textile | Procion yellow HE4R(Reactive Yellow 84) | O3/High pH | Inlet TOC: 75 mg/L, | Sample volume 1.5L, 3.51g/hr ozone, pH 12, 1.0hr duration. | Idil Arslan et al., 2000 [22] |
Removal rate: 48.3% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 65 | ||||||
2 | Remazol Black SB(Reactive Black 5) | O3/High pH | Inlet TOC 75mg/L, | Sample volume 1.5L, 3.51g/hr ozone, pH 12, 1.0hr duration. | Idil Arslan et al., 2000 [22] | |
Removal rate: 61.9% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 50.4 | ||||||
3 | Petroleum-Refinery | Synthetic refinery wastewater; Toluene, Xylene, Phenol, O-cresol, Naphthalene, Nonane, Hexadecane, Ammonium Chloride, sodium and Sodium Chloride | O3/H2O2 | Inlet TOC 68mg/L, | Sample volume 1L, 1.16g/hr ozone, 472mg/L H2O2, pH 10, 1.5hr duration. | H. Demir-Duz et al., 2020 [25] |
Removal rate: 74% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 34.6 | ||||||
4 | Synthetic refinery wastewater; Toluene, Xylene, Phenol, O-cresol, Naphthalene, Nonane, Hexadecane, Ammonium Chloride, sodium and Sodium Chloride | O3 | Inlet TOC 68mg/L, | Sample volume 1L, 1.16g/hr ozone, pH 10, 1.5hr duration. | H. Demir-Duz et al., 2020 [25] | |
Removal rate: 57% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 44.9 | ||||||
5 | Real Refinery Wastewater contaminant like hydrocarbons, phenolic substances, naphthenic acids, sulfides and nutrients. | O3/H2O2 | Inlet TOC 15.3mg/L, | Sample volume 1L, 0.9g/hr ozone, 47mg/L H2O2, pH 8.2, 1.0hr duration. | H. Demir-Duz et al., 2020 [25] | |
Removal rate: 77% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 76.4 | ||||||
6 | Real Refinery Wastewater contaminant like hydrocarbons, aldehydes, esters, alcohols, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles | O3/Fe | TOC 31~38mg/L, | Sample volume 2L, 10.2mg/L aqueous ozone, 110g/L Fe-Ni pH 8.3, 2hr duration. | Yuanxing Huang et al., 2019 [24] | |
Removal rate: 61% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 17.3 | ||||||
7 | Petrochemical | Aromatic protein, Fulvic acid, Soluble microbial by-product, humic acid | O3/H2O2 | Inlet TOC 18.3~28.6mg/L, | Sample volume 4L, 2.1g/L ozone, 1.47g/L H2O2, pH 6.9~7.8, 1.0hr duration. | Liya Fu et al., 2019 [26] |
Removal rate: 23.8% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 77.1 | ||||||
8 | Complex Industrial Wastewater | Synthetic wastewater; succinic acid(C4H6O4) | O3 | Inlet TOC 60mg/L, | Sample volume 5.2L 0.624g/L ozone, pH 7, 1.0hr duration | Mathias Ernst et al., 2004 [27] |
Removal rate: 32% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 6.3 | ||||||
9 | Synthetic wastewater; succinic acid(C4H6O4) | O3/H2O2 | Inlet TOC 60mg/L, | Sample volume 5.2L 0.624g/L ozone, 0.624g/L ozone, 0.187g/L H2O2, pH 7, 1.0hr duration | Mathias Ernst et al., 2004 [27] | |
Removal rate: 43% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 4.7 | ||||||
10 | Pulp & Paper | Stach degradation products(Saccharides, carboxylic acid), Phenolic compounds arising from lignin, other pollutants which is present in the fresh water. | O3/H2O2 | Inlet TOC 110mg/L, | Water volumen 3L, 4.7g/hr ozone, 5mM H2O2, pH 11, 0.5hr duration. | E. Cokay Catalkaya et al., 2007 [23] |
Removal rate: 30.9% | ||||||
O3/ΔTOC ratio: 23.0 |